Pathways to urban health and well-being: measuring and modelling of community services in a medium size city


Social and natural capital are fundamental to people’s wellbeing, often within the context of local community. Developing communities and linking people together provide benefits in terms of mental well-being, physical activity and other associated health outcomes. The research presented here was carried out in Christchurch - Ōtautahi, New Zealand, a city currently re-building, after a series of devastating earthquakes in 2010 and 2011. Poor mental health has been shown to be a significant post-earthquake problem, and social connection has been postulated as part of a solution. By curating a disparate set of community services, activities and facilities, organised into a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) database, we created i) an accessibility analysis of 11 health and well-being services, ii) a mobility scenario analysis focusing on 4 general well-being services and iii) a location-allocation model focusing on 3 primary health care and welfare location optimisation. Our results demonstrate that overall, the majority of neighbourhoods in Christchurch benefit from a high level of accessibility to almost all the services; but with an urban-rural gradient (the further away from the centre, the less services are available, as is expected). The noticeable exception to this trend, is that the more deprived eastern suburbs have poorer accessibility, suggesting social inequity in accessibility. The findings presented here show the potential of optimisation modelling and database curation for urban and community facility planning purposes.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Adeniyi, A.F., Uloko, A.E., Sani-Suleiman, I., 2009. Exercise Capacity in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Preliminary Investigation. Afr. J. Biomed. Res. 12, 175-179–179.

Ala-Hulkko, T., Kotavaara, O., Alahuhta, J., Helle, P., Hjort, J., 2016. Introducing accessibility analysis in mapping cultural ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 66, 416–427.

Albino, V., Berardi, U., Dangelico, R.M., 2015. Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 22, 3–21.

Bagheri, N., Benwell, G.L., Holt, A., 2005. Measuring spatial accessibility to primary health care.

Bagnall, A.-M., South, J., Di Martino, S., Southby, K., Pilkington, G., Mitchell, B., Pennington, A., Corcoran, R., 2018. Places, spaces, people and wellbeing: full review. School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

Beere, P., 2016. Creating a Road Network Analysis Layer with Travel Time Estimates using Opensource Data. GeoHealth Laboratory University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Beheshtifar, S., Alimoahmmadi, A., 2015. A multiobjective optimization approach for location-allocation of clinics. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 22, 313–328.

Camarri, B., Eastwood, P.R., Cecins, N.M., Thompson, P.J., Jenkins, S., 2006. Six minute walk distance in healthy subjects aged 55-75 years. Respir. Med. 100, 658–665.

Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Ferrini, F., Salbitano, F., Agrimi, M., Portoghesi, L., Semenzato, P., Sanesi, G., 2015. Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 134, 221–228.

Cetin, M., 2015. Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: case study in Kutahya. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 22, 420–424.

Chen, I.H., Kuo, K.N., Andriacchi, T.P., 1997. The influence of walking speed on mechanical joint power during gait. Gait Posture 6, 171–176.

Chetta, A., Zanini, A., Pisi, G., Aiello, M., Tzani, P., Neri, M., Olivieri, D., 2006. Reference values for the 6-min walk test in healthy subjects 20-50 years old. Respir. Med. 100, 1573–1578.

Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260.

Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., Danigelis, N.L., Dickinson, J., Elliott, C., Farley, J., Gayer, D.E., Glenn, L.M., Hudspeth, T., Mahoney, D., McCahill, L., McIntosh, B., Reed, B., Rizvi, S.A.T., Rizzo, D.M., Simpatico, T., Snapp, R., 2007. Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecol. Econ. 61, 267–276.

Cram, F., McCreanor, T., Tuhiwai Smith, L., Nairn, R., Johnstone, W., 2006. Kaupapa Māori Research and Pākehā Social Science: Epistemological Tensions in a Study of Māori Health. Hülili: Multidisciplinary Research on Hawaiian Well-Being 3, 41–68.

Dadvand, P., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., Esnaola, M., Forns, J., Basagaña, X., Alvarez-Pedrerol, M., Rivas, I., López-Vicente, M., Pascual, M.D.C., Su, J., Jerrett, M., Querol, X., Sunyer, J., 2015. Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 7937–7942.

Ekkel, E.D., de Vries, S., 2017. Nearby green space and human health: Evaluating accessibility metrics. Landsc. Urban Plan. 157, 214–220.

Exeter, D.J., Zhao, J., Crengle, S., Lee, A., Browne, M., 2017. The New Zealand Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD): A new suite of indicators for social and health research in Aotearoa, New Zealand. PLOS ONE 12, e0181260.

Finlay, J., Franke, T., McKay, H., Sims-Gould, J., 2015. Therapeutic landscapes and wellbeing in later life: Impacts of blue and green spaces for older adults. Health Place 34, 97–106.

Gascon, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Martínez, D., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Plasència, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Gascon, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Martínez, D., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Plasència, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., 2015. Mental Health Benefits of Long-Term Exposure to Residential Green and Blue Spaces: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 12, 4354–4379.

Grant, S., 2017. Social enterprise in New Zealand: an overview. Soc. Enterp. J. 13, 410–426.

Guagliardo, M.F., 2004. Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. Int. J. Health Geogr. 3, 3.

Guerry, A.D., Polasky, S., Lubchenco, J., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daily, G.C., Griffin, R., Ruckelshaus, M., Bateman, I.J., Duraiappah, A., Elmqvist, T., Feldman, M.W., Folke, C., Hoekstra, J., Kareiva, P.M., Keeler, B.L., Li, S., McKenzie, E., Ouyang, Z., Reyers, B., Ricketts, T.H., Rockström, J., Tallis, H., Vira, B., 2015. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 7348–7355.

Harmthworth, G.R., Awatere, S., 2013. INDIGENOUS MĀORI KNOWLEDGE AND PERSPECTIVES OF ECOSYSTEMS, in: New Zealand – Conditions and Trends. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand, pp. 274–286.

Helliwell, J.F., Putnam, R.D., 2004. The social context of well-being. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 359, 1435–1446.

Hogg, D., Kingham, S., Wilson, T.M., Ardagh, M., 2016. The effects of relocation and level of affectedness on mood and anxiety symptom treatments after the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Soc. Sci. Med. 1982 152, 18–26.

Kenney, C., 2019. Ahi Kā Roa, Ahi Kā Ora Ōtautahi: Māori, Recovery Trajectories and Resilience in Canterbury, New Zealand, in: James, H. (Ed.), Population, Development, and the Environment: Challenges to Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in the Asia Pacific. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp. 375–394.

Kingham, S., Dioniso, R., Newman, P., 2015. The right tools at the right time: Encouraging community involvement in the post-disaster reconstruction of Christchurch, New Zealand. Presented at the IGU Urban Commission Annual Conference, 9th-16th August 2015, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Kingston, R., 2007. Public Participation in Local Policy Decision-making: The Role of Web-based Mapping. Cartogr. J. 44, 138–144.

Langford, M., Higgs, G., 2006. Measuring Potential Access to Primary Healthcare Services: The Influence of Alternative Spatial Representations of Population. Prof. Geogr. 58, 294–306.

Marans, R.W., 2015. Quality of urban life & environmental sustainability studies: Future linkage opportunities. Habitat Int., Measuring the Prosperity of Cities 45, 47–52.

Marek, L., Campbell, M., Bui, L., 2017. Shaking for innovation: The (re)building of a (smart) city in a post disaster environment. Cities 63, 41–50.

Masser, I., 2001. Managing our urban future: the role of remote sensing and geographic information systems. Habitat Int. 25, 503–512.

McGrail, M.R., Humphreys, J.S., 2014. Measuring spatial accessibility to primary health care services: Utilising dynamic catchment sizes. Appl. Geogr. 54, 182–188.

Meng, Y.L., Malczewski, J., 2015. A GIS-based multicriteria decision making approach for evaluating accessibility to public parks in Calgary, Alberta. Hum. Geogr. - J. Stud. Res. Hum. Geogr. 9, 29–41.

Ministry of Transport - Te Manatu Waka, 2016. Transport Outlook: Future state. A starting discussion on the future of transport in New Zealand. Ministry of Transport New Zealand, Wellington.

Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S., 1998. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23, 242–266.

Neutens, T., 2015. Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers. J. Transp. Geogr. 43, 14–27.

Orchiston, C., Higham, J.E.S., 2016. Knowledge management and tourism recovery (de)marketing: the Christchurch earthquakes 2010–2011. Curr. Issues Tour. 19, 64–84.

Pearce, J., Witten, K., Bartie, P., 2006. Neighbourhoods and health: a GIS approach to measuring community resource accessibility. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60, 389–395.

Polo, G., Acosta, C.M., Ferreira, F., Dias, R.A., 2015. Location-Allocation and Accessibility Models for Improving the Spatial Planning of Public Health Services. PLOS ONE 10, e0119190.

Saeri, A.K., Cruwys, T., Barlow, F.K., Stronge, S., Sibley, C.G., 2018. Social connectedness improves public mental health: Investigating bidirectional relationships in the New Zealand attitudes and values survey. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 52, 365–374.

Salmond, C., Crampton, P., Sutton, F., 1998. NZDep91: A New Zealand index of deprivation. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 22, 835–837.

Sargisson, L., Sargent, L.T., Sargent, L.T., 2017. Living in Utopia : New Zealand’s Intentional Communities. Routledge.

Schindler, M., Dionisio, R., Kingham, S., 2018. A multi-level perspective on a spatial data ecosystem: needs and challenges among urban planning stakeholders in New Zealand. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 13, 223–252.

Shah, T.I., Bell, S., Wilson, K., 2016. Spatial Accessibility to Health Care Services: Identifying under-Serviced Neighbourhoods in Canadian Urban Areas. PLOS ONE 11, e0168208.

Smoyer‐Tomic, K.E., Hewko, J.N., Hodgson, M.J., 2004. Spatial accessibility and equity of playgrounds in Edmonton, Canada. Can. Geogr. Géographe Can. 48, 287–302.

Terrier, P., Reynard, F., 2015. Effect of age on the variability and stability of gait: A cross-sectional treadmill study in healthy individuals between 20 and 69 years of age. Gait Posture 41, 170–174.

Thompson, C.W., Aspinall, P.A., 2011. Natural Environments and their Impact on Activity, Health, and Quality of Life. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 3, 230–260.

Thornley, L., Ball, J., Signal, L., Aho, K.L.-T., Rawson, E., 2015. Building community resilience: learning from the Canterbury earthquakes. Kōtuitui N. Z. J. Soc. Sci. Online 10, 23–35.

Tsou, K.-W., Hung, Y.-T., Chang, Y.-L., 2005. An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities 22, 424–435.

Vemuri, A.W., Costanza, R., 2006. The role of human, social, built, and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level: Toward a National Well-Being Index (NWI). Ecol. Econ. 58, 119–133.

Wiki, J., Kingham, S., Campbell, M., 2018. Accessibility to food retailers and socio-economic deprivation in urban New Zealand. N. Z. Geogr. 0.

Wiseman, J., Brasher, K., 2008. Community wellbeing in an unwell world: trends, challenges, and possibilities. J. Public Health Policy 29, 353–366.

Wood, A., Noy, I., Parker, M., 2016. The Canterbury rebuild five years on from the Christchurch earthquake. Reserve Bank N. Z. Bull. 79, 1–16.

Wridt, P., 2010. A Qualitative GIS Approach to Mapping Urban Neighborhoods with Children to Promote Physical Activity and Child-Friendly Community Planning. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 37, 129–147.

Yeo, I.-A., Yoon, S.-H., Yee, J.-J., 2013. Development of an Environment and energy Geographical Information System (E-GIS) construction model to support environmentally friendly urban planning. Appl. Energy 104, 723–739.

Zhang, W., Cao, K., Liu, S., Huang, B., 2016. A multi-objective optimization approach for health-care facility location-allocation problems in highly developed cities such as Hong Kong. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 59, 220–230.

Zhou, X., Kim, J., 2013. Social disparities in tree canopy and park accessibility: A case study of six cities in Illinois using GIS and remote sensing. Urban For. Urban Green. 12, 88–97.

Original Articles
Community facilities, accessibility, Health and Well-being, location/allocation modelling, medium size city
  • Abstract views: 492

  • PDF: 272
  • Appendix: 58
  • HTML: 0
How to Cite
Vannier, C., Campbell, M., & Kingham, S. (2020). Pathways to urban health and well-being: measuring and modelling of community services in a medium size city. Geospatial Health, 15(1).