Balancing geo-privacy and spatial patterns in epidemiological studies

DOI https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2017.573

Article Sidebar

PDF APPENDIX HTML
Published: Nov 8, 2017
Original Articles

Issue
Vol 12, No 2 (2017)
Keywords
Geo-privacy, Geo-masking, Spatial epidemiology, D statistics
Statistics
Abstract Views: 1466

PDF: 189
APPENDIX: 103
HTML: 814
Share it
How to Cite
Chen, C.-C., Chuang, J.-H., Wang, D.-W., Wang, C.-M., Lin, B.-C., & Chan, T.-C. (2017). Balancing geo-privacy and spatial patterns in epidemiological studies. Geospatial Health, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2017.573
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Main Article Content

Chien-Chou Chen
Center for Geographic Information Science, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China.
Jen-Hsiang Chuang
Centers for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China.
Da-Wei Wang
Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China.
Chien-Min Wang
Center for Geographic Information Science, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei; Department of Geography, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China.
Bo-Cheng Lin
Center for Geographic Information Science, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China.
Ta-Chien Chan *
Center for Geographic Information Science, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China.
(*) Corresponding Author:
Ta-Chien Chan | dachianpig@gmail.com

Abstract

To balance the protection of geo-privacy and the accuracy of spatial patterns, we developed a geo-spatial tool (GeoMasker) intended to mask the residential locations of patients or cases in a geographic information system (GIS). To elucidate the effects of geo-masking parameters, we applied 2010 dengue epidemic data from Taiwan testing the tool’s performance in an empirical situation. The similarity of pre- and post-spatial patterns was measured by D statistics under a 95% confidence interval. In the empirical study, different magnitudes of anonymisation (estimated Kanonymity ≥10 and 100) were achieved and different degrees of agreement on the pre- and post-patterns were evaluated. The application is beneficial for public health workers and researchers when processing data with individuals’ spatial information.

Downloads month by month

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details