https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2012.133
Response to Geocoding-protected health information using online services may compromise patient privacy - Comments on Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods by Duncan et al.
Submitted: 17 December 2014
Accepted: 17 December 2014
Published: 1 May 2012
Accepted: 17 December 2014
Abstract Views: 868
PDF: 725
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
How to Cite
Duncan, D. T., Castro, M. C., & Blossom, J. C. (2012). Response to Geocoding-protected health information using online services may compromise patient privacy - Comments on Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods by Duncan et al. Geospatial Health, 6(2), 158–159. https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2012.133
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
