https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2025.1324
Design and implementation of a spatial database for analysis of wheelchair accessibility
Submitted: 25 June 2024
Accepted: 8 December 2024
Published: 24 March 2025
Accepted: 8 December 2024
Abstract Views: 499
PDF: 73
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Accessibility is an essential consideration in the design of public spaces, and commonly referred to as ‘pedestrian accessibility’ when walking is the primary mode of transportation. Computational methods, frequently coupled with Geographic Information systems (GIS), are increasingly available for assessing pedestrian accessibility using digital cartographic data such as road networks and digital terrain models. However, they often implicitly assume a level of mobility that may not be achievable by individuals with mobility impairments, e.g., wheelchair users. Therefore, it remains uncertain whether conventional pedestrian accessibility adequately approximates ‘wheelchair accessibility,’ and, if not, what computational resources would be required to evaluate it more accurately. We therefore designed a spatial database aimed at customizing mobility networks according to mobility limitations and compared the accessibility of a university campus for people with and without wheelchairs under various assumptions. The results showed there are clusters of locations either completely inaccessible or substantially less accessible for wheelchair users, indicating the presence of particular ‘wheelchair coldspots’, not only due to steep slopes and stairways but also arising from unforeseen consequences of aesthetic and safety enhancements, such as pebble pavements and raised sidewalks. It was found that a combination of simple spatial queries would help identifying potential locations for mobility aids such as ramps. These findings suggest that accessibility is not an invariant of a public space but experienced differently by different groups. Therefore, more comprehensive needs analysis and spatial database design are necessary to support inclusive design of healthier public spaces.
Ambrosio F, Boninger ML, Souza AL, Fitzgerald SG, Koontz AM, Cooper RA, 2005. Biomechanics and strength of manual wheelchair users. J Spinal Cord Med 28:407–14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2005.11753840
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, As Amended. (1990). ADA.gov. Availabe from: https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/ada/
Arai Y, Kusakabe T, Niwa,Y, Honma K, 2022. Evaluation of wheelchair accessibility in train stations using a spatial network. Asian Transp Stud 8:100067.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eastsj.2022.100067
Borisoff JF, Ripat J, Chan F, 2018. Seasonal patterns of community participation and mobility of wheelchair users over an entire year. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99:1553–1560.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.02.011
Bromley RDF, Matthews D, Thomas CJ, 2007. City centre accessibility for wheelchair users: The consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities 24:229–241.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.009
Brubaker CE, McLaurin CA, McClay IS, 1986. Effects of side slope on wheelchair performance. J rehabil Res Dev 23:55–8.
Byars M, Wei A, Handy S, 2017. Sustainable Transportation Terms: A Glossary. Institute for Transportation Studies.
Cooper RA, Molinero AM, Souza A, Collins DM, Karmarkar A, Teodorski E. Sporner M, 2012. Effects of cross slopes and varying surface characteristics on the mobility of manual wheelchair users. Assistive Technol 24:102–109.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2012.659326
Cooper RA, VanSickle, DP, Albright SJ, Stewart KJ, Flannery M, Robertson RN, 1995. Power wheelchair range testing and energy consumption during fatigue testing. J Rehabil Res Dev 32:255-63.
Da Silva Bertolaccini G, Sandnes FE, Medola FO, Gjøvaag T, 2022. Effect of manual wheelchair type on mobility performance, cardiorespiratory responses, and perceived exertion. Rehabil Res Pract 2022, 1–11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5554571
Disability Discrimination Act. (1992). Australian Human Rights Commission. Available from: https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/disability-rights/disability-discrimination
European Parliament - Regulation - 78/2009 - EN - EUR-LEX. (2009). Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/78/oj
Fernández-Arango D, Varela-García F, González-Aguilera D, Lagüela-López S, 2022. Automatic Generation of Urban Road 3D Models for Pedestrian Studies from LiDAR Data. Remote Sensing 14:1102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051102
Flemmer CL, 2022. Improving the built environment for manual wheelchair users: A review. IOP Conference Series. Earth Environ Sci 1101:032031.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1101/3/032031
Goodchild MF, Li L, 2012. Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics 1:110–20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002
Haklay M. 2010. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environment & Planning. B, Planning & Design/Environment and Planning 37:682–703.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b35097
Handy S, Niemeier D, 1997. Measuring Accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environ Planning A: Econ Space 29:1175–94.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a291175
Hematian H, Ranjbar E, 2022. Evaluating urban public spaces from mental health point of view: Comparing pedestrian and car-dominated streets. J Transport Health 27:101532.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101532
Henje C, Stenberg G, Lundälv J, Carlsson A, 2021. Obstacles and risks in the traffic environment for users of powered wheelchairs in Sweden. Accident Anal Prev 159:106259.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106259
Howell NA, Booth GL, 2022. The weight of place: built environment correlates of obesity and diabetes. Endocr Rev 43;966–83.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnac005
International Standard Organization (2021). ISO 21542:2021. ISO.Building construction—Accessibility and usability of the built environment. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/71860.html
Jehle U, Coetzee C, Büttner B, Pajares E, Wulfhorst G, 2022. Connecting people and places: Analysis of perceived pedestrian accessibility to railway stations by Bavarian case studies. J Urban Mobility 2;100025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100025
Kapsalis E, Jaeger N, Hale J, 2024. Disabled-by-design: effects of inaccessible urban public spaces on users of mobility assistive devices – a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technol 19;604–622.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2111723
Kasemsuppakorn P, Karimi HA, 2013. A pedestrian network construction algorithm based on multiple GPS traces. Transport Res Part C, Emerg Technol 26:285–300.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.09.007
Lesbegueries J, Lachiche N, Braud A, Skupinski G, Puissant A, Perret J, 2012. A platform for spatial data labeling in an urban context. In Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (pp. 49–61).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10595-1_4
Lenker JA, Damle U, D’Souza C, Paquet V, Mashtare T, Steinfeld E, 2016. Usability evaluation of access ramps in transit buses: preliminary findings. Jo Public Transportation 19:109-27.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.19.2.7
Liu S, Higgs C, Arundel J, Boeing G, Cerdera N, Moctezuma D, Cerin E, Adlakha D, Lowe M, Giles‐Corti B, 2021. A Generalized Framework for Measuring Pedestrian Accessibility around the World Using Open Data. Geograph Anal 54;559–82.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12290
Lo RH, 2009. Walkability: what is it? J Urbanism 2;145–166.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170903092867
Long D, 2020. Introduction to mobility and wheelchair assessment. In Elsevier eBooks; pp. 403–409.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102694-6.00024-3
Merlin LA, Jehle U, 2023. Global interest in walking accessibility: a scoping review. Transport Reviews, 43;1021–54.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2023.2189323
Meyers AR, Anderson JJ, Miller, DR, Shipp K, Hoenig H, 2002. Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: sbstantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Soc Sci Med 55;1435–46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00269-6
Nightingale TE, Rouse P, Thompson D, Bilzon JLJ, 2017. Measurement of physical activity and energy expenditure in wheelchair users: methods, considerations and future directions. Sports Medicine - Open 3(1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-017-0077-0
Páez A, Anjum Z, Dickson‐Anderson S, Schuster‐Wallace CJ, Ramos B, Higgins CD, 2020. Comparing distance, time, and metabolic energy cost functions for walking accessibility in infrastructure-poor regions. J Transport Geogr 82;102564.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102564
Pérez-delHoyo R, Andújar-Montoya MD, Mora H, Gilart-Iglesias V, 2019. Unexpected consequences in the operation of urban environments. Kybernetes, 48:253–64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2018-0096
Popp W, Richner L, Brogioli M, Wilms B, Spengler CM, Curt A, Starkey M, Gassert R, 2018. Estimation of energy expenditure in Wheelchair-Bound spinal cord injured individuals using inertial measurement units. Frontiers in Neurology, 9:00478
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00478
Sahoo SK, Choudhury BB, 2023. Wheelchair accessibility: bridging the gap to equality and inclusion. Decision Making Adv 1:63–85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/dma1120239
Schöttler S, Yang Y, Pfister H, Bach B, 2021. Visualizing and interacting with geospatial networks: a survey and design space. Computer Graphics Forum 40;5–33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14198
Sol M, Verschuren O, Horemans HLD, Westers P, Visser-Meily JMA, De Groot JF, 2021. The effects of wheelchair mobility skills and exercise training on physical activity, fitness, skills and confidence in youth using a manual wheelchair. Disabil Rehabil 44:4398–407.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1907456
Thomas L, Borisoff J, Sparrey CJ, 2018. Manual wheelchair downhill stability: an analysis of factors affecting tip probability. J Neuroengin Rehabil 15(1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0450-3
United Nations - Sustainable development goals. 2015. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Wu Y, Ding X, Dai X, Zhang P, Lu T, Gu N, 2022. Alignment Work for Urban accessibility: A study of how wheelchair users travel in urban spaces. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction, 6:1–22.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3555165
Yang X, Tang L, Ren C, Yang C, Xie Z, Li Q, 2019. Pedestrian network generation based on crowdsourced tracking data. Internat J Geograph Informat Sci 34:1051–74.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1702197
How to Cite
Nezval, P., & Shirabe, T. (2025). Design and implementation of a spatial database for analysis of wheelchair accessibility. Geospatial Health, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2025.1324
Copyright (c) 2025 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
