Interpreting predictive maps of disease: highlighting the pitfalls of distribution models in epidemiology

Submitted: 7 July 2015
Accepted: 7 July 2015
Published: 1 November 2014
Abstract Views: 1867
PDF: 823
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The application of spatial modelling to epidemiology has increased significantly over the past decade, delivering enhanced understanding of the environmental and climatic factors affecting disease distributions and providing spatially continuous representations of disease risk (predictive maps). These outputs provide significant information for disease control programmes, allowing spatial targeting and tailored interventions. However, several factors (e.g. sampling protocols or temporal disease spread) can influence predictive mapping outputs. This paper proposes a conceptual framework which defines several scenarios and their potential impact on resulting predictive outputs, using simulated data to provide an exemplar. It is vital that researchers recognise these scenarios and their influence on predictive models and their outputs, as a failure to do so may lead to inaccurate interpretation of predictive maps. As long as these considerations are kept in mind, predictive mapping will continue to contribute significantly to epidemiological research and disease control planning.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Wardrop, N. A., Geary, M., Osborne, P. E., & Atkinson, P. M. (2014). Interpreting predictive maps of disease: highlighting the pitfalls of distribution models in epidemiology. Geospatial Health, 9(1), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2014.397